frequently the dream-speech is pieced together from different recollections of spoken remarks; the wording
has remained the same, but the sense has perhaps become ambiguous, or differs from the wording.
Not infrequently the dream-speech serves merely as an allusion to an incident in connection with which
the remembered speech was made. *
* In the case of a young man who was suffering from obsessions, but whose intellectual functions were
intact and highly developed, I recently found the only exception to this rule. The speeches which occurred
in his dreams did not originate in speeches which he had heard had made himself, but corresponded to
the undistorted verbal expression of his obsessive thoughts, which came to his waking consciousness
only in an altered form.
B. The Work of Displacement
Another and probably no less significant relation must have already forced itself upon our attention while
we were collecting examples of dream-condensation. We may have noticed that these elements which
obtrude themselves in the dream-content as its essential components do not by any means play this
same part in the dream-thoughts. As a corollary to this, the converse of this statement is also true. That
which is obviously the essential content of the dream-thoughts need not be represented at all in the
dream. The dream is, as it were, centred elsewhere; its content is arranged about elements which do
not constitute the central point of the dream-thoughts. Thus, for example, in the dream of the botanical
monograph the central point of the dream- content is evidently the element botanical; in the dream- thoughts,
we are concerned with the complications and conflicts resulting from services rendered between colleagues
which place them under mutual obligations; later on with the reproach that I am in the habit of sacrificing
too much time to my hobbies; and the element botanical finds no place in this nucleus of the dream-
thoughts, unless it is loosely connected with it by antithesis, for botany was never among my favourite
subjects. In the Sappho- dream of my patient, ascending and descending, being upstairs and down, is
made the central point; the dream, however, is concerned with the danger of sexual relations with persons
of low degree; so that only one of the elements of the dream-thoughts seems to have found its way into
the dream-content, and this is unduly expanded. Again, in the dream of my uncle, the fair beard, which
seems to be its central point, appears to have no rational connection with the desire for greatness which
we have recognized as the nucleus of the dream-thoughts. Such dreams very naturally give us an impression
of a displacement. In complete contrast to these examples, the dream of Irma's injection shows that
individual elements may claim the same place in dream-formation as that which they occupy in the dream-
thoughts. The recognition of this new and utterly inconstant relation between the dream- thoughts and
the dream-content will probably astonish us at first. If we find, in a psychic process of normal life, that
one idea has been selected from among a number of others, and has acquired a particular emphasis in
our consciousness, we are wont to regard this as proof that a peculiar psychic value (a certain degree
of interest) attaches to the victorious idea. We now discover that this value of the individual element
in the dream- thoughts is not retained in dream-formation, or is not taken into account. For there is
no doubt which of the elements of the dream- thoughts are of the highest value; our judgment informs
us immediately. In dream-formation the essential elements, those that are emphasized by intensive
interest, may be treated as though they were subordinate, while they are replaced in the dream by other
elements, which were certainly subordinate in the dream-thoughts. It seems at first as though the psychic
intensity * of individual ideas were of no account in their selection for dream-formation, but only their
greater or lesser multiplicity of determination. One might be inclined to think that what gets into the
dream is not what is important in the dream-thoughts, but what is contained in them several times over; but
our understanding of dream-formation is not much advanced by this assumption; to begin with, we cannot
believe that the two motives of multiple determination and intrinsic value can influence the selection of
the dream otherwise than in the same direction. Those ideas in the dream-thoughts which are most
important are probably also those which recur most frequently, since the individual dream-thoughts radiate
from them as centres. And yet the dream may reject these intensely emphasized and extensively reinforced
elements, and may take up into its content other elements which are only extensively reinforced.