his martial followers; and after the departure of his cousin, Joscelin himself was invested with the county
of Edessa on both sides of the Euphrates. By economy in peace, his territories were replenished with
Latin and Syrian subjects; his magazines with corn, wine, and oil; his castles with gold and silver, with
arms and horses. In a holy warfare of thirty years, he was alternately a conqueror and a captive: but
he died like a soldier, in a horse litter at the head of his troops; and his last glance beheld the flight of
the Turkish invaders who had presumed on his age and infirmities. His son and successor, of the same
name, was less deficient in valor than in vigilance; but he sometimes forgot that dominion is acquired
and maintained by the same arms. He challenged the hostility of the Turks, without securing the friendship
of the prince of Antioch; and, amidst the peaceful luxury of Turbessel, in Syria,6 Joscelin neglected the
defence of the Christian frontier beyond the Euphrates. In his absence, Zenghi, the first of the Atabeks,
besieged and stormed his capital, Edessa, which was feebly defended by a timorous and disloyal crowd
of Orientals: the Franks were oppressed in a bold attempt for its recovery, and Courtenay ended his
days in the prison of Aleppo. He still left a fair and ample patrimony But the victorious Turks oppressed
on all sides the weakness of a widow and orphan; and, for the equivalent of an annual pension, they
resigned to the Greek emperor the charge of defending, and the shame of losing, the last relics of the
Latin conquest. The countess-dowager of Edessa retired to Jerusalem with her two children; the daughter,
Agnes, became the wife and mother of a king; the son, Joscelin the Third, accepted the office of seneschal,
the first of the kingdom, and held his new estates in Palestine by the service of fifty knights. His name
appears with honor in the transactions of peace and war; but he finally vanishes in the fall of Jerusalem; and
the name of Courtenay, in this branch of Edessa, was lost by the marriage of his two daughters with a
French and German baron.7
II. While Joscelin reigned beyond the Euphrates, his elder brother Milo, the son of Joscelin, the son of
Atho, continued, near the Seine, to possess the castle of their fathers, which was at length inherited
by Rainaud, or Reginald, the youngest of his three sons. Examples of genius or virtue must be rare
in the annals of the oldest families; and, in a remote age their pride will embrace a deed of rapine and
violence; such, however, as could not be perpetrated without some superiority of courage, or, at least,
of power. A descendant of Reginald of Courtenay may blush for the public robber, who stripped and
imprisoned several merchants, after they had satisfied the king's duties at Sens and Orleans. He will
glory in the offence, since the bold offender could not be compelled to obedience and restitution, till the
regent and the count of Champagne prepared to march against him at the head of an army.8 Reginald
bestowed his estates on his eldest daughter, and his daughter on the seventh son of King Louis the
Fat; and their marriage was crowned with a numerous offspring. We might expect that a private should
have merged in a royal name; and that the descendants of Peter of France and Elizabeth of Courtenay
would have enjoyed the titles and honors of princes of the blood. But this legitimate claim was long
neglected, and finally denied; and the causes of their disgrace will represent the story of this second
branch. 1. Of all the families now extant, the most ancient, doubtless, and the most illustrious, is the
house of France, which has occupied the same throne above eight hundred years, and descends, in
a clear and lineal series of males, from the middle of the ninth century.9 In the age of the crusades,
it was already revered both in the East and West. But from Hugh Capet to the marriage of Peter, no
more than five reigns or generations had elapsed; and so precarious was their title, that the eldest sons,
as a necessary precaution, were previously crowned during the lifetime of their fathers. The peers of
France have long maintained their precedency before the younger branches of the royal line, nor had
the princes of the blood, in the twelfth century, acquired that hereditary lustre which is now diffused
over the most remote candidates for the succession. 2. The barons of Courtenay must have stood
high in their own estimation, and in that of the world, since they could impose on the son of a king the
obligation of adopting for himself and all his descendants the name and arms of their daughter and his
wife. In the marriage of an heiress with her inferior or her equal, such exchange often required and
allowed: but as they continued to diverge from the regal stem, the sons of Louis the Fat were insensibly
confounded with their maternal ancestors; and the new Courtenays might deserve to forfeit the honors
of their birth, which a motive of interest had tempted them to renounce. 3. The shame was far more
permanent than the reward, and a momentary blaze was followed by a long darkness. The eldest son
of these nuptials, Peter of Courtenay, had married, as I have already mentioned, the sister of the counts
