But to say nothing of the inner dignity of histories of this kind (possibly they are of use for some one
or for something), the histories of culture, towards which all general histories tend more and more to
approximate, are noteworthy from the fact that though they give a serious and detailed analysis of various
religious, philosophic, and political doctrines as causes of events, every time they have to describe an
actual historical event, as, for instance, the campaign of 1812, they unconsciously describe it as the
effect of the exercise of power, frankly saying that that campaign was the work of Napoleons will. In
saying this, the historians of culture unconsciously contradict themselves, to prove that the new force
they have invented is not the expression of historical events, and that the sole means of explaining history
is by that power which they had apparently rejected.